Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Rev. bras. ter. intensiva ; 32(2): 245-250, Apr.-June 2020. tab, graf
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1138483

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Objetivo: Aferir a relação entre tempo para evacuação de foco e mortalidade hospitalar em portadores de sepse e choque séptico. Métodos: Estudo observacional, unicêntrico, com análise retrospectiva do tempo para evacuação de foco séptico abdominal. Os pacientes foram classificados conforme o tempo para evacuação do foco em grupo precoce (≤ 12 horas) ou tardio (> 12 horas). Resultados: Foram avaliados 135 pacientes. Não houve associação entre tempo para evacuação do foco e mortalidade hospitalar (≤ 12 horas versus > 12 horas): 52,3% versus 52,9%, com p = 0,137. Conclusão: Não houve diferença na mortalidade hospitalar entre pacientes com sepse ou choque séptico que tiveram foco infeccioso evacuado antes ou após 12 horas do diagnóstico de sepse.


ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the relationship between time to focus clearance and hospital mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Methods: This was an observational, single-center study with a retrospective analysis of the time to clearance of abdominal septic focus. Patients were classified according to the time to focus clearance into an early (≤ 12 hours) or delayed (> 12 hours) group. Results: A total of 135 patients were evaluated. There was no association between time to focus clearance and hospital mortality (≤ 12 hours versus > 12 hours): 52.3% versus 52.9%, with p = 0.137. Conclusion: There was no difference in hospital mortality among patients with sepsis or septic shock who had an infectious focus evacuated before or after 12 hours after the diagnosis of sepsis.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Shock, Septic/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Sepsis/mortality , Intraabdominal Infections/mortality , Shock, Septic/therapy , Time Factors , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/therapy , Intraabdominal Infections/therapy
2.
Afr. J. Clin. Exp. Microbiol ; 20(4): 268-279, 2019. ilus
Article in English | AIM | ID: biblio-1256085

ABSTRACT

Background: Even though intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) has been increasingly recognized, with associated high morbidity and mortality rates, its pathogenesis remains poorly understood. This model aims to study the pathogenicity and invivo susceptibility of non-albicans Candida species associated with IAC in human in order to predict the frequency of infections, outcome of clinical disease and response to antifungal therapy. Methodology: Both immunosuppressed and immunocompetent female CD-1 mice were challenged intraperitoneally with 5 x 108 CFU/ml inoculum of five non-albicans Candida strains; Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, Candida lipolytica, Candida tropicalis and Candida guilliermondii. Mice were closely observed for symptoms. Treated groups received voriconazole (40 mg/kg/day) or micafungin (10 mg/kg/day) 24 hours after infection depending on invitro susceptibility results. Survival rate, mean survival time and fungal tissue burdens were recorded for all groups. Results: All infected groups developed hepatosplenomegaly, peritonitis and multiple abscesses on intra-abdominal organs and mesenteries. C. glabrata and C. lipolytica represented the most and the least virulent strains respectively in terms of survival rate, mean survival time and fungal burden in both immunosuppressed and immunocompetent models. Following treatment, all immunocompetent animals survived the entire duration of experiments (0% mortality rate), while mortality rate was relatively high (20-60%) in immunosuppressed mice. Treatment failed to eradicate the infection in immunosuppressed mice despite significant decrease of the fungal burden and increase mean survival time. Conclusion: This study reports an increasing pathogenicity of non-albicans Candida species, with persistent infection among immunosuppressed animals


Subject(s)
Candida , Candidiasis , Egypt , Intraabdominal Infections , Intraabdominal Infections/mortality , Mice
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL